Casino Gambling In Sullivan County
2021年10月10日Register here: http://gg.gg/w6b46
’Stimulating meaningful thought & debate in Sullivan County without retribution’
*Casino Gambling In Sullivan County
*Casinos In Sullivan County Ny
The approved fine for SugarHouse HSP Gaming, L.P. Was $45,000 and was the result of a similar investigation at Rivers Casino Philadelphia by BIE into the issuance of discretionary free slot play. In this matter, BIE found 405 instances in which discretionary free slot play was issued by employees in amounts in excess of amounts that were. Find casino in Surrounding Sullivan County on Yellowbook. Get reviews and contact details for each business including videos, opening hours and more.The Casino Push is On AgainAnd finally, Sullivan County residents will be able to vote pro or con
by Ruby Pixman
Since Sullivan County is among the areas being considered for casinos, our residents stand to be most affected by any decision regarding the construction of new houses of gambling.
Once again, there’s a new push for casinos in Sullivan County.
Recently, Governor Andrew Cuomo presented his latest plan that would open New York’s first three casinos in upstate locations and prohibit them being built in New York City, its northern suburbs and Long Island for five years.
We’ve been waiting for casino gaming here in Sullivan County for several generations. But this time a new approach is being considered, and it really may happen once and for all.
After approving a change later this year Split rock resort casino. to the New York State Constitution, which right now prohibits casino gambling establishments, Governor Cuomo and the State Legislature are going to ask voters across the state to approve a casino gaming amendment.
In the past that didn’t stop pro-gambling legislators from trying to get around the ban. The primary tool was to grant licenses to recognized American Indian tribes, some of which have no geographical or historical connection to this area. Since the Indian tribes’ lands have been considered quasi-independent jurisdictions, they are immune from many federal, state, and local laws. In exchange for such gaming licensing, the Indian-run casinos kick-in a certain percentage of their takings to the various governments that are in on the deal.Casino Gambling In Sullivan County
There are a number of such casinos already in existence across New York State and the rest of the country. As anyone living in the Catskills knows, there were more planned for our region, but they never came to fruition.
Many impediments prevented such Indian casino establishments in the Catskills during the last decade, such as opposition by the Bush administration, anti-casino politicians, religious groups and even segments of our local populations. Local residents expressed concern about possible increased traffic and noise, detrimental environmental conditions, and even issues involving gambling addictions and the morality of government-sanctioned gambling.
There’s another issue that was rarely discussed back then, but now may be coming to the forefront: The possibly unethical reliance on supposed Indian tribal sovereignty to circumvent the NY Constitution. Casinos In Sullivan County Ny
Instead of taking this issue head on Insurance in blackjack meaning. , and allowing Indian gaming to continue, Cuomo has sought to address this problem by recommending that a state-wide referendum be held, that if passed, would nullify the constitutional ban. Regardless if one favors or disagrees with establishing casinos in Sullivan County and New York State, the public referendum would at least allow voters to have the final say as to whether they want gambling establishments in their midst.
The latest proposal has raised many questions: How many casinos should be constructed in the Catskills, and where should they be located? Would these questions be subjected to other local approvals, zoning issues, and referendums and at what governmental level(s)? Since Sullivan County is among the areas being considered for casinos, our residents stand to be most affected by any decision regarding the construction of new houses of gambling.
No doubt most Sullivan County voters have heard all the arguments, pro and con on casino construction, and many would like to see the issue resolved.
Will we soon get to vote on our preferences, or will Sullivan County continue to remain in limbo for another half century?
##
This week, NRDC submitted written comments affirming a message we voiced to the New York Gaming Facilities Location Board last week at a public hearing in Poughkeepsie—don’t approve a license for a massive resort and casino complex in the middle of Sterling Forest State Park.
NRDC also stated the Location Board that the Catskills should not be home to multiple casinos.
For those of you asking, “Gaming Facilities Location Board who?” or haven’t been following NY casino issues generally, let’s start with some background.
The Magnificent Sterling Forest. Photo Courtesy of Rodger Friedman.
NRDC has been fighting inappropriate casino development in New York for the last decade, ever since then-governor George Pataki put forth a plan to turn the Catskills into the Atlantic City of New York by building five Indian casinos in Sullivan County.
In response to fierce opposition from NRDC and other allies, Pataki’s plan for five fizzled, but we continued to fight individual Indian casinos proposed for sensitive natural areas—such as a plan by the Stockbridge Munsee Tribe to build a massive facility in the banks of the pristine Neversink River.
Since last November, the fight has taken on a new dimension with the passage of state constitutional amendment that now makes it legal for up to seven non-Indian casinos to be sited within the state. Until the passage of this Constitutional change, full-fledged casinos could only be placed on federal or sovereign tribal land.
Under the current implementing legislation, in the next seven years, up to four casinos could be built within three development regions (which exclude New York City), provided no region gets more than two. After that, it’s possible that three more casinos could be built, including one or more in New York City.
With sixteen applications now on the table for the first four potential licenses, it’s the state Gaming Facilities Location Board that gets to choose the lucky winners (no pun intended).
Mist over Sterling Forest. Photo Courtesy of Rodger Friedman.
While NRDC does not take a position on gambling generally, casinos, like other large-scale commercial facilities, often come with some significant environmental impacts—to name a few: snarling traffic with associated air pollution, massive land clearance, glaring illumination 24-hours a day, and ripple effects from suburban sprawl. In other words, sensitive or specially-protected natural areas just aren’t the right place for casinos.
Unfortunately, large, well-financed casino developers don’t always see things that way, and that’s why we’ve continued to challenge inappropriate casino development in New York’s important natural areas. And of the current proposals now before the Board, we are particularly concerned about a large casino complex in the heart of Sterling Forest State Park and the continued threat of the clustering of multiple casinos in the Catskills region of Sullivan County
What the Catskills and Sterling Forest provide New Yorkers is invaluable—an incredible landscape of pristine waterways, spectacular vistas, and an unusual diversity of wildlife, all within an easy commute from the most populous areas of the state. Importantly, these special areas also play an integral role in providing clean drinking water to over 13 million people.
Ironically, it is the stunning and immaculate quality of these areas that make them so attractive to casino developers. That is certainly the case in Sterling Forest, where developer Genting Americas, plans to build a mammoth facility—a 1.4 million square-foot complex with a 1,000-room hotel, a 50,000 square-foot gaming floor, and 7,000 parking spaces—on several hundred acres of private land located in the center of the park.
Although the developer does plan to include “green” design features and some environmental mitigation, by design, a massive commercial gaming facility threatens the very integrity of the Forest, which was protected only after a decades-long battle and the expenditure of over $100 million dollars of public and private funds.
Thankfully, while the promise of casino riches may be tempting to some, the Palisades Interstate Park Commission (the interstate agency responsible for managing Sterling Forest) boldly rejected Genting’s request to use any Commission-controlled land to facilitate new highways and roads that would be necessary to accommodate new increased traffic volumes to the complex.
The Gaming Facilities Location Board should now follow suit and make clear that the integrity New York’s most treasured natural areas—including Sterling Forest and the Catskills—are not for sale.
UPDATE 10.2.14: The U.S. National Park Service has now also weighed in against the Sterling Forest casino proposal. Here is the crux of what it had to say to the Location Board:
’Due to the high potential for substantial adverse impacts to the Appalachian National Scenic Trail, the National Park Service respectfully requests that the New York State Gaming Commission not issue a permit for a development on this site. Instead, consideration of applications for permits located in alternate locations more suitable for a development of this scale is requested.’
Register here: http://gg.gg/w6b46
https://diarynote-jp.indered.space
’Stimulating meaningful thought & debate in Sullivan County without retribution’
*Casino Gambling In Sullivan County
*Casinos In Sullivan County Ny
The approved fine for SugarHouse HSP Gaming, L.P. Was $45,000 and was the result of a similar investigation at Rivers Casino Philadelphia by BIE into the issuance of discretionary free slot play. In this matter, BIE found 405 instances in which discretionary free slot play was issued by employees in amounts in excess of amounts that were. Find casino in Surrounding Sullivan County on Yellowbook. Get reviews and contact details for each business including videos, opening hours and more.The Casino Push is On AgainAnd finally, Sullivan County residents will be able to vote pro or con
by Ruby Pixman
Since Sullivan County is among the areas being considered for casinos, our residents stand to be most affected by any decision regarding the construction of new houses of gambling.
Once again, there’s a new push for casinos in Sullivan County.
Recently, Governor Andrew Cuomo presented his latest plan that would open New York’s first three casinos in upstate locations and prohibit them being built in New York City, its northern suburbs and Long Island for five years.
We’ve been waiting for casino gaming here in Sullivan County for several generations. But this time a new approach is being considered, and it really may happen once and for all.
After approving a change later this year Split rock resort casino. to the New York State Constitution, which right now prohibits casino gambling establishments, Governor Cuomo and the State Legislature are going to ask voters across the state to approve a casino gaming amendment.
In the past that didn’t stop pro-gambling legislators from trying to get around the ban. The primary tool was to grant licenses to recognized American Indian tribes, some of which have no geographical or historical connection to this area. Since the Indian tribes’ lands have been considered quasi-independent jurisdictions, they are immune from many federal, state, and local laws. In exchange for such gaming licensing, the Indian-run casinos kick-in a certain percentage of their takings to the various governments that are in on the deal.Casino Gambling In Sullivan County
There are a number of such casinos already in existence across New York State and the rest of the country. As anyone living in the Catskills knows, there were more planned for our region, but they never came to fruition.
Many impediments prevented such Indian casino establishments in the Catskills during the last decade, such as opposition by the Bush administration, anti-casino politicians, religious groups and even segments of our local populations. Local residents expressed concern about possible increased traffic and noise, detrimental environmental conditions, and even issues involving gambling addictions and the morality of government-sanctioned gambling.
There’s another issue that was rarely discussed back then, but now may be coming to the forefront: The possibly unethical reliance on supposed Indian tribal sovereignty to circumvent the NY Constitution. Casinos In Sullivan County Ny
Instead of taking this issue head on Insurance in blackjack meaning. , and allowing Indian gaming to continue, Cuomo has sought to address this problem by recommending that a state-wide referendum be held, that if passed, would nullify the constitutional ban. Regardless if one favors or disagrees with establishing casinos in Sullivan County and New York State, the public referendum would at least allow voters to have the final say as to whether they want gambling establishments in their midst.
The latest proposal has raised many questions: How many casinos should be constructed in the Catskills, and where should they be located? Would these questions be subjected to other local approvals, zoning issues, and referendums and at what governmental level(s)? Since Sullivan County is among the areas being considered for casinos, our residents stand to be most affected by any decision regarding the construction of new houses of gambling.
No doubt most Sullivan County voters have heard all the arguments, pro and con on casino construction, and many would like to see the issue resolved.
Will we soon get to vote on our preferences, or will Sullivan County continue to remain in limbo for another half century?
##
This week, NRDC submitted written comments affirming a message we voiced to the New York Gaming Facilities Location Board last week at a public hearing in Poughkeepsie—don’t approve a license for a massive resort and casino complex in the middle of Sterling Forest State Park.
NRDC also stated the Location Board that the Catskills should not be home to multiple casinos.
For those of you asking, “Gaming Facilities Location Board who?” or haven’t been following NY casino issues generally, let’s start with some background.
The Magnificent Sterling Forest. Photo Courtesy of Rodger Friedman.
NRDC has been fighting inappropriate casino development in New York for the last decade, ever since then-governor George Pataki put forth a plan to turn the Catskills into the Atlantic City of New York by building five Indian casinos in Sullivan County.
In response to fierce opposition from NRDC and other allies, Pataki’s plan for five fizzled, but we continued to fight individual Indian casinos proposed for sensitive natural areas—such as a plan by the Stockbridge Munsee Tribe to build a massive facility in the banks of the pristine Neversink River.
Since last November, the fight has taken on a new dimension with the passage of state constitutional amendment that now makes it legal for up to seven non-Indian casinos to be sited within the state. Until the passage of this Constitutional change, full-fledged casinos could only be placed on federal or sovereign tribal land.
Under the current implementing legislation, in the next seven years, up to four casinos could be built within three development regions (which exclude New York City), provided no region gets more than two. After that, it’s possible that three more casinos could be built, including one or more in New York City.
With sixteen applications now on the table for the first four potential licenses, it’s the state Gaming Facilities Location Board that gets to choose the lucky winners (no pun intended).
Mist over Sterling Forest. Photo Courtesy of Rodger Friedman.
While NRDC does not take a position on gambling generally, casinos, like other large-scale commercial facilities, often come with some significant environmental impacts—to name a few: snarling traffic with associated air pollution, massive land clearance, glaring illumination 24-hours a day, and ripple effects from suburban sprawl. In other words, sensitive or specially-protected natural areas just aren’t the right place for casinos.
Unfortunately, large, well-financed casino developers don’t always see things that way, and that’s why we’ve continued to challenge inappropriate casino development in New York’s important natural areas. And of the current proposals now before the Board, we are particularly concerned about a large casino complex in the heart of Sterling Forest State Park and the continued threat of the clustering of multiple casinos in the Catskills region of Sullivan County
What the Catskills and Sterling Forest provide New Yorkers is invaluable—an incredible landscape of pristine waterways, spectacular vistas, and an unusual diversity of wildlife, all within an easy commute from the most populous areas of the state. Importantly, these special areas also play an integral role in providing clean drinking water to over 13 million people.
Ironically, it is the stunning and immaculate quality of these areas that make them so attractive to casino developers. That is certainly the case in Sterling Forest, where developer Genting Americas, plans to build a mammoth facility—a 1.4 million square-foot complex with a 1,000-room hotel, a 50,000 square-foot gaming floor, and 7,000 parking spaces—on several hundred acres of private land located in the center of the park.
Although the developer does plan to include “green” design features and some environmental mitigation, by design, a massive commercial gaming facility threatens the very integrity of the Forest, which was protected only after a decades-long battle and the expenditure of over $100 million dollars of public and private funds.
Thankfully, while the promise of casino riches may be tempting to some, the Palisades Interstate Park Commission (the interstate agency responsible for managing Sterling Forest) boldly rejected Genting’s request to use any Commission-controlled land to facilitate new highways and roads that would be necessary to accommodate new increased traffic volumes to the complex.
The Gaming Facilities Location Board should now follow suit and make clear that the integrity New York’s most treasured natural areas—including Sterling Forest and the Catskills—are not for sale.
UPDATE 10.2.14: The U.S. National Park Service has now also weighed in against the Sterling Forest casino proposal. Here is the crux of what it had to say to the Location Board:
’Due to the high potential for substantial adverse impacts to the Appalachian National Scenic Trail, the National Park Service respectfully requests that the New York State Gaming Commission not issue a permit for a development on this site. Instead, consideration of applications for permits located in alternate locations more suitable for a development of this scale is requested.’
Register here: http://gg.gg/w6b46
https://diarynote-jp.indered.space
コメント